farse_sm.jpg EneryVIII.jpg

Monday, May 30, 2005

Over-paid, Over-sexed, Over Here

T-PearblossomSm.jpgHE FIRST TIME I drove my family to Vegas, drove the van the back way to Vegas, the Pearblossom way, the dust-deviled road through California Mojave; first time I drove us all through the desert, was struck by its barrenness, its emptiness. Nuthin' here but wind and dirt and rock and scrub; split-handed Joshua trees fielding distant cragged hills. Drove us through tiny tumbleweeded towns with high-numbered streets, 133rd, 215th, city streets without a city out there in the middle of nowhere. Careful here, she says, Slow down: Highway Patrol are bored as raptors and wait to fall upon casino-headed prey. Wondered, first, How on earth d'they ever make a livin' here?, these tumbledown towns, snarled old-timers rocking in the wind beside 50's-style pumps, overalled mechanics glowering, spitting in the dust? Wondered next - call me hokey if you will - wondered why on earth they ever came? Why would men from way out emptiness of here where News seems not to reach, as far-removed as I had ever seen, why would men from here sail six thousand miles to die cold frozen-fingered deaths in shell-torn forests of Belgium or beaches and hedgerows of Normandy?

They did not have to come, but I'm grateful that they did.

As every schoolboy briton will attest who spent his summers playing Japsies in the woods or Dead Man's Fall, t'was feisty Tommy stood foursquare and beat the hated Hun? The Yanks - when finally they joined - arrived too late when all the work was done, in time to rob us of our glory and our wummin? It was not so. Though stand we did and battered and blitzed and blockaded we were; though valiant we tried in Africa, in Norway, Malta and Dieppe, we were not quite enough to turn the tide and send Fritz running with his tail between his legs. We steadfast isolated island we, it was a close-run thing, and though too proud perhaps to openly admit, we needed them; we called, and they replied. Out of cities and farms and even empty desert, from every tiny town across a continent wider than the ocean.

They did not have to come, but I'm grateful that they did.

Today this day it is Memorial Day - what we would call Rememberance Day - wherein remembered are the dead who fought in foreign wars; who came, but never back again. Of those who answered country's call and sailed and fought wherever they were told, who died there, bitter soaking deaths an ocean away, and all for people they had never met nor likely ever would. This, then, is my rememberance, a man full-grown without the press of jackboot to his throat, who never had to lift a finger in his life and all because of other people's sacrifice; this is my rememberance, simple perhaps but keenly felt:

I know they did not have to come, but I'm grateful that they did.

Friday, May 27, 2005

Always Judge A Book By It's Cover

I always judge a book by it's cover: or at least, I always intend to do so, but sometimes skip over the remainder of the blurb if it scores with an early hit?

Idiot.

I usually give a book fifty pages to engage me - generous I think you'll agree, given my limited attention span? Anyway. Sat on the cold wooden "comfiest chair" very late last night, and decided the book I was reading was.. well, let us just say that it had found for itself appropriate accomodation within our household? What had gone wrong?

I read the backspiece blurb again, but this time in it's entirety. Aah. If only I'd read it more fully before I'd have known, the instant I saw the word soupçon, to drop the book calmly to the floor, neither looking to the left nor to the right, and walk purposefully away in the manner of Michael Corleone.

I'd never ever deliberately read any book with a frisson of frisson or a soupçon of soupçon appearing anywhere on its cover. Never.

Some people exist in this life to serve as an example to others. Take heed, reader.

Thursday, May 26, 2005

Filifluster

Cool: someone at Slate today answers my "how do they filibuster" question:

Another fallacy inherent in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington is the notion that the modern-era filibuster has anything to do with what Sen. Robert Byrd (citing Mr. Smith in a March 1 floor speech) grandly calls "the deliberative process." As Byrd well knows, contemporary practice eliminates the speechifying part of the filibuster altogether; these days, whenever a filibuster is threatened, the Senate majority will typically calculate whether it has the 60 votes necessary to cut off debate, and if it doesn't, it won't bother to bring the legislation in question to a floor vote at all. (Byrd, I should note, filibustered—the old-fashioned way—14 hours against passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. That's the law that banned discrimination in public facilities! So forgive me if his views on the subject don't command my full attention.)

This is such a Star Trek solution. You know - the one where, rather than have a real war, two battling planets instead play war games with each other and choose civilian casualties by lottery, who are then gently euthenized? "Oh my god!" the planners shriek, "They've hit Capital City with a nuke!"

Tuesday, May 24, 2005

Balance of Power

I'm still chuckling. What usually happens in democracies elsewhere, those who employ proportional representation to fill parliamentary seats, is that the majority party very rarely finds itself with an absolute majority - where it has more seats than all other parties combined - and is therefore bound to forge alliances and coalitions with some of its political enemies.

This quite often results in tremendous powers being vested in tiny, fearsome, wingnut parties: they have just enough seats to keep a government in power, or contrariwise, to kill it if some fundamental demands are not met.

I'm chuckling today because, for once, the opposite appears to be happening: in a congress filled almost to the brim with two opposing sets of extremists, one side having a very small notional majority over the other, the balance of power now sits in the lap of fourteen moderates.

Anyone who is able to piss-off Powerline and Atrios in one fell swoop gets my vote...

Le Despair des Étrangers

I answered the questions twice, and both times came up with the same result. I guess this proves I never really knew what an Existentialist was, for I never quite saw myself as being one?

Oh dearie me - the Shame, the Shame - to be one with the frenchies? Or am I not supposed to feel shame any more, since none of that matters, apparently?

You scored as Existentialist. Existentialism emphasizes human capability. There is no greater power interfering with life and thus it is up to us to make things happen. Sometimes considered a negative and depressing world view, your optimism towards human accomplishment is immense. Mankind is condemned to be free and must accept the responsibility.

Existentialist


100%

Cultural Creative


88%

Materialist


81%

Idealist


69%

Modernist


50%

Romanticist


44%

Postmodernist


31%

Fundamentalist



19%

What is Your World View? (corrected...again)
created with QuizFarm.com

[HatTips to The Misspent Life and to DarkoV]

And so, to try to cheer me up, and in the manner of compulsives everywhere, follow the DarkOne all the way down the secret cave...

You scored as Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Congratulations! You are obsessive-compulsive! You know nothing curbs images of mutilating your mother like a good counting/checking/washing ritual... wait, DID you forget to turn off the stove???

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder


58%

Unipolar Depression


50%

Antisocial Personality Disorder


33%

Borderline Personality Disorder


0%

Eating Disorders


0%

Schizophrenia


0%

Which mental disorder do you have?
created with QuizFarm.com

I don't get it. The questions in that last one were plain stupid, but the answer is correct. Compulsive? Absolutely, but in stupid trivial ways that annoy the hell out of my belovèd. Witnessed, indeed, by the sharper amongst you that hang about my every word and click to Here whenever you sense a new post? I publish each post over and over again, noticing, correcting, tweaking punctuation and whatnot? It is eating me right now, f'rinstance, that I cannot get that "Fundamentalist" lined-up with it's "19%". Curse Blogger, mildly, that there is no "fold" to hide the tables under? It just never ends.

Let us not forget either - although that may be oxymoronic - the reply we received from this site, and this test:


*** ADULT-ADD ASSESSMENT ***

Subject: Bearded, F.C

Happily, medical science is advancing rapidly.
Come back then.


Feching frenchie indeed? Huff.

Sunday, May 22, 2005

Fried

Angels-0102-sm.jpgBurnt to a feching crisp.

A close friend of mine - english, it happens - once tried to explain cricket to me: The point of cricket, he rather gravely intoned, is to sit in the sun with your pals and drink beer all afternoon. But, as every Fifer knows, the sun never shines in Cowdenbeath: he could Stuff his bloody cricket! Not that I ever lived in Cowdenbeath - but I lived close enough that our Town caught the edge of its gloom. Fifers also know that, just as the Innuit have fifty words for snow, so inhabitants of Cowdenbeath have fifty words for miserable.

But baseball ain't cricket; Los Angeles ain't West Fife; and Dodger Stadium of a Sunday afternoon is most definitely not Central Park (and Central Park ain't that Central Park neither, in case you are too lazy to follow the link).

What a glorious day: the start of the game, the Angels were all over the Dodgers, and it looked as though we'd be watching a massacre. Turned out we did, just not the one we expected. The Angels fell apart in the sixth and seventh - ably assisted by a relief pitcher who gave away a homer with his first throw. My first "Hit the Road, Jack", a reliever relieved.

And though the Dodgers have been on the bad-end of a thumping in all their recent games, today they gubbed the Angels 6 to 2.

That's cos we were there. Told you: I've never seen them lose. And surely, now, with those very words, I've jinxed them? But if it turns out I haven't - and we'll know June 4th - then they ought to be thinking of giving me a good-seat season ticket for free.

Took our daughter and her friend with us today. Discovered we were embarassing her by joining in the wave - that girl sooo has the wrong parents. It meant we sang "Take me oot" loudly and operatically. With gestures and gusto.

I did try to buy a jersey today. I waited twenty minutes in line at the concession stand only for some wide-mouthed fat-arse with a kid and a cell phone to waltz in front of me at the very last, start jabbertalking at the poor lassie behind the counter. I was about to give him a piece of my walking stick when two things prevented me: first, I noticed that the woman behind the counter, and all her colleagues, were completely ignoring him, and other customers, and were instead staring forward over our heads. The anthem was playing. Second, while fuming and building a head of outrage, I noticed a price sticker on the shirt I had my eye on: $175. One hundred and seventy-five dollars for a feching sports shirt? Well, Fatso, says I, you're welcome to it!, before hobbling off. Bastard. It was He ate all the pies.

OH: one last thing before I go. Stupid and senseless it may be, but somehow hopelessly funny too: Clicky.

If you've ever read Bravo Two Zero it may help crystallize for you, as it did for me, why Tom Clancey novels are so ridiculously pompous and unreadable? That link does so too: does nobody ever laugh in the US armed services?
[Hat tip: Sullivan and Norm]

Walt's Favorite Timeof Day

Sundown96.jpg



Visit Disneyland, or Disneyworld with your kids, chances are that, in the course of your visit, you will discover that Walt had fifty different "favorite times of day" - in one place you will learn "Lunchtime was Walt Disney's favorite time of day"; in another "Nighttime was Walt Disney's favorite time of day"; another still might say "11.22am was Walt's favorite time of day". Lucky Walt.

I only have one.

There is something sublime about sundown here, when the sun has fallen below the horizon: the empty sky so crisp; the silhouetted palm trees sharp as razors; the slide of color from rose through the spectrum of blues to darkest midnight.

Saturday, May 21, 2005

Age shall not wither us

I know it didn't, not really, but to my tired forty-two year old ears I'd swear that TV commercial just "introduced" me to the new Ford Super-Doody?

I have automatic switch-off circuitry that kicks-in upon mention of the word "introdoocing" in any commercial. Introdoocing our total lack of imagination.

Still: almost as good as the war on "tourism" and the "Crapmatic" bed.

Take Me Out To The Dodgahs... again

Yay - tickets for tomorrow's ball game, Dodgers v. Angels: slightly mixed feelings because I have a soft-spot for the Angels, but hey - this is war. Screw 'em.

Off to buy me a Dodger shirt and hat.


LATER: Dang! The only sports store in Simi - Big Five - they don't sell Dodger paraphernalia. What kind of sports store is that?

Now that I think about it, I have to ask: is it just me, or is it generally true that US sports franchises - who thrive upon merchandising and other collateral doo-dahs to fill their coffers, who go to extreme lengths to ream money out of every conceivable corner - that these same franchises have totally missed-out on the Shirt Swindle?

No idea what I'm talking about?

It runs like this: a typical british or european soccer club will produce at least two new shirts - strips we prefer to call them - two new-design strips every single season, complete with chest advertising, one Home, one Away. Then they sell them for $60+ a pop in the sure and certain knowledge that all ther fans will by themselves and their kids new strips every season? It's a cow that keeps on milking, season after season?

Now, I know the Dodger franchise here charges upwards of $60 for a Dodger T-shirt or whatever, but they do not, so far as I know, re-design the strips every season.

Or do they? You tell me.

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

War Movies

BoB96.jpg NLIKE THE ESTIMABLE StephenEsque, I must confess to being totally the meme slut - those little answer-ten-questions-pass-it-on quizzes that appear most Friday mornings, or the "What Type of Pop Tart Are You" tests? I love them, and can't resist them even when I have other posts to write and am already burdened by real-life work. Answering pointless quizzes helps me think of other things, helps my blurriest thoughts congeal. Theraputic, if you like?

I answer them, but I don't often post them: mostly they sit in my blogbox with a shiney green "draft" label. When I do post, it usually means I am completely devoid of other ideas, or that I really need to post something quickly to move beyond some embarassment that needs to be moved off the top of the page.

Today is a bit of both, but a little bit more. Norm asks us to list our favorite war movies - which genre, more than any other, more even than "scary", infested my childhood. These are the movies I'd beg my dad so's I could stay-up late on a Saturday night to watch; these are the movies that played on lazy Sunday afternoons when the telly was otherwise filled with stupid and boring religious programs; these are the movies I spent my pocket-money on, without complaining, when they ran on the Saturday matinees I habitually attended.

Doctor Zhivago - a movie I detest to my bones to this day - Doctor Zhivago was not a war movie; yet it cost me all of my pocket money - including the sweetie portion - to watch it in the theater that day. One of only three movies I ever walked out on: Lost Horizons was another, because it was awful, and Valley of the Gwangi, because it scared my schoolboy pants off.

No: the only thing better than a ripping war movie, in my ten year-old eyes, was a new James Bond. They were holy.

What follows, then, is chiefly a list of boyhood favorites, exhibiting a schoolboy critic aesthetic rather than some dull grown-up pantywaist movie writer's. There are a couple of glaring exceptions, you will quickly spot, included here for specific scenes that, had the movies played when I were a lad, would have given our summer vacations their purpose, and infused every game of "Japs and Commandos" whether played in woods, quarry, or garages.

  1. Battle of Britain - our all-time favorite war movie - "MY EYES! I'm not s'pposed to get bullets in them!" Give me a squadron of Spitfires. Ian Mcshane, long before Deadwood. Michael Caine: "Don't frow. That blahdy messerschmidt. At me.";

  2. 633 Squadron - its theme we screamed when we played on the swings; and we flew around the schoolyard for months as Mosquitos, holding our hands palm-out from our faces, gattling our fingers as nose guns;

  3. Where Eagles Dare - treachery and broken necks. Throw the colonel oot the plane;

  4. The Guns of Navarone - machine-guns through fishing nets, Anthony Quail falling off a cliff, Anthony Quinn as a badass partisan, Stanley Baker traitor, and best of all - Rat Bombs;

  5. The Dam Busters - bouncing bombs and theater lights - "Little lower... little lower... That's it! Bomb's gone!" and a theme dear to every briton's heart;

  6. The Longest Day - I watch this movie, June 6th, every bloody year. Almost worth it alone for the invasion fleet seeping out of the fog scene, and Kenneth More the Beachmaster. Richard Todd, incidentally, who plays a british paratroop shooting from the hip while taking a bridge, he pretty-much played himself there;

  7. Bridge on the River Kwai - Alec Guiness and whistling "Colonel Bogey";

  8. The Dirty Dozen - what man among you does not, to this day, hesitate before shaving with cold water? I thought not;

  9. The Great Escape motorbikes, blind Donald Pleasance, poor-old Hudson the butler being machine-gunned like a dog, and a ton of dirt down your pants;

  10. Kelly's Heroes - in a word, Oddball;

  11. Apocalypse Now! - for helicopters coming out of the rising sun, of course. And... this;

All but one of these movies has played here on american television several times in the past couple of years. The one glaring omission, especially to brits - well, I'll let you guess which one it is. If you are at all familiar with the movie, and think about it a little, it becomes quite obvious why it will never play here. Not without a name-change, anyhow?

Oh - and little boys can't count, I know.


Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Pratfall

One of the more ridiculous notions that britons cling to in their multi-faceted and contrary opinions of "americans" - which I "quote" in this case to emphasise my own belief that most britons don't know any actual americans, or if they do probably no more than one or two who, it invariably transpires, are exceptions that prove the fantasy Rule - is the firm belief that americans "have no sense of irony"? We britons, of course, launched Blackadder and Fawlty Towers upon an unsuspecting world, proving that "we", naturally, do.

To simply state that ironies abound in America, most especially in american politics, would be to miss the point entirely: ironies abound everywhere. The trick, your smug-lipped brit would argue, is to recognize them, and that is the skill that americans lack?

Well, by goodness, the trick is on thee: the true artist knows that spotting an irony is nothing more complicated than "getting a joke", that the real skill, the craft, the art, lies in the writing of it.

There is no finer ironist working today than Mr President George W Bush.

Thickie Bush, dipshit Bush, dumbwit Bush, Bush The Brain, Chimpy Bush. Call him whatever you will? The very same.

He is Blackadder and Baldrick and Queenie all wrapped-up in one. His election campaign last year - which I promise not to dwell upon - was a masterpiece that left me flabbergasted until I saw it for what it was, and finally got the joke?

This week, Newsweek week, provides a perfect example: Queenie demands full accountability from Newsweek, a magazine, for publishing a claim that copies of the Koran were flushed down a toilet as a form of psychological torture, in Guantanemo Bay of all places. Queenie - old Weapons of Mass Defamation himself - blames Newsweek for the deaths of a dozen or so Afghans at the hands of rioting fundamentalists. Better yet, he is joined in his calls by his chorus, and like all the best Pantomime Dames, has his bloggerel audience in the palm of his hand, singing and roaring and clapping along from the aisles and the stalls.

I ought to be awed - indeed, I am in a way - but some jokes, no matter how cleverly contrived, some jokes just aren't funny.

If you are familiar at all with this blog, you will know that its author is shy of political commentary, because he knows he is crap at it and always leaves himself looking more foolish than those he would decry. He prefers to leave the commentary to others - the Andrew Sullivans of the world - who despite fundamental differences annunciate some of his political and moral positions more eloquently than he ever could? Well, Sullivan speaks for me on torture.

You will also know that I, Bearded, am a supporter of our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, of the liberation of oppressed peoples from heinous tyranny? But I draw the line at torture. It may indeed be necessary, even excusable, at times and under certain circumstances, but it should never be legal, and those who would perpetrate it, or sanction it, or order it, they ought to be held to account and be prepared to bear full responsibility of their actions.

It is my personal belief that the act of torturing prisoners, even where it may indeed be necessary, shames us deeply. It is a shame that I feel keenly, the more so I suppose because I support the overarching venture. Gawd knows I am an incompetent logician, to say the least, so perhaps someone more skilled in rhetoric can find an honorable way out of the equation, (SupporterOfWar == SupporterOfTorture), because idiot me is having trouble finding it? It probably is not good enough for me to say "I do but I do not"?

I make no apologies for supporting the war; I'll even accept any chicken-hawk insults you throw my way because, honestly, that's what I am. I support this war, but I do not support or condone the use of torture. And I am shamed beyond shame by this public and brazen capital-M Mockery that is now under way. It won't hurt you, Mr Bush, and it won't kill me, Mr Bearded, but I have an eighteen year-old son with an eye on the army who sees himself, without any encouragement from me, as helping to liberate the poor and oppressed and despised, who wants to go fight in Darfur against the kind of evil that would employ twelve-year old boys as assassins, or the evil men of Iraq or wherever who would corrupt sweet-natured Downes Syndrome into suicide bomber? He and his like are the ones who will pay for the torturous acts that you set into motion, Mr Bush, and now mock with such throwaway contempt.

At the heart of this post lies a monstrous web of irony. I sincerely hope that our american press, our MSM, will now join in the game with full vigor, and run with this joke you've set-up, Mr Bush; run with it, play with it, turn it around, that it all comes a-tumbling and a-crashing down on your head, Mr Bush, as all true comedy must in the end.

Sorry. I'll get me coat, as they say in Britain.

Monday, May 16, 2005

Emphasis on "Trip"

H-haste96.jpgASTE THEE NYMPH, and bring with thee
Jest and youthful Jollity,
Quips and cranks, and wanton wiles,
Nods, and becks, and wreathed smiles,
Such as hang on Hebe's cheek,
And love to live in dimple sleek;
Sport that wrinkled Care derides,
And Laughter holding both his sides.
Come, and trip it as ye go
On the light fantastic toe,
And in thy right hand lead with thee,
The mountain-nymph, sweet Liberty


- Milton, L'Allegro
How strange it is to read Outer Life or Small Victory, or one or two other sites whose names, forgive me, escape me for the moment; How strange it is these writers lives - all unknown to me - so often seem to coincide with, indeed to echo, my own? Outer Life in particular has been scaring the bejumption out of me recently. This post, which I read today, is an example - even though I didn't know what "cotillion" meant:

"Cotillion?"

"Cotillion teaches manners, how to dance with a girl, how to get her punch, how to act like an adult. Now get dressed, we're almost there."

"There" was a frigid cold dance studio, mirrored walls and wooden floor, a long table with punch bowl and cookies, and maybe twenty of us milling about, uneasily eyeing each other. The girls wore party dresses with hose and shiny patent leather shoes, evoking Jackie O and 1963, while the boys wore polyester jackets and ties, slacks flared out over their platform shoes, evoking The Love Boat and Saturday Night Fever. A real time clash.

I shiver at such memories - they occupy the same terror zone as "walk with your hands behind your back, like Prince Philip!", which, dammit, I still do.

That dance-floor clumsiness and awkwardness learned in school gym lessons has stayed with me over the years - worsened, even, by dodgy knees and ankles from rugby days - but despite that, and in open disclosure of it, I wanted desperately to learn to tango with my wife. Only she, mind: I have no desire whatsoever to dance such an intimate and charged dance as the Calumpher Tango with anyone but my Goddess - even though, don't you know, the Tango was originally a male-only dance down there in the Buenos Aries docks? The chances of me being able to remember the steps, let along elegantly tread them, were slim from the outset; but I wanted to give it a go.

We discovered a restaurant on Ventura Blvd, argentinian, which promised dinner and free tango lessons. Perfect. The food turned out to be awful, but we weren't really there to eat - though we did and were starving - we were there to learn to dance together. Lessons began midway though the main course; we were not too upset to leave our seats.

The lessons began well: our teacher and his partner would demonstrate, which we tyros would attempt to copy; clumsy, sure, but fun. But with barely one tune behind us the lesson ended, and onto the floor crowded "the Club": a gang of earnest devotees and regular attendees. Not to worry, we hoped, we can still dance together at the side?

No. We were instructed to change partners - this would happen every three tunes or so in strict rotation. The women were to move on.

Awful.

My shame and embarassment were thrice rewarded by older lady partners, none of whom I would have chosen, who each brought with them a penchant for bright dresses and heavy eye-liner and piercing stiletto heels; and also that traditional, visceral contempt of Servants of the Dance for those who step babywise? At scottish weddings, where nobody is supposed to know the steps, this class of dancer always give themselves away by their footwear, which will be plymsols or proper "ballet boots", as we call them? They tut, they snigger, they huff and puff and try, with feigned cameraderie, to enlighten the others on the floor - who all know and understand that the whole point of scottish country dancing is that it be danced furiously and ignorantly while drunk.

My tango partners - witches three - they hated me. And I hated them. No other words for it. Their hatred showed in muttered oaths laced with spit, while Mine was manifest in an indelicate foot and a very awkward knee.

We laughed, my wife and I, all the way home that night at how awful an event that was. And pledged there and then that we'd never be back.


Sunday, May 15, 2005

A Hangin' Tree

T-Real96.jpgO DINNER LAST NIGHT with the in-laws to a nice seafood restaurant in Calabasas, directly opposite Sagebrush Cantina, where desperado bikers still gather of a weekend. Limping and sticked with arthritis, took a moment to pause at the entrance. Now, I've been to this same place many times before, but had never paid any attention to the bell at it's door: one of the original bells that marked El Camino Real - the long dusty trail between the Missions that founded the State of California?

We see these bells everywhere - they are quite distinctive - planted at the sides of freeways and other routes. This one, however, according to a placard at its base, had been positioned at this place in 1876, under the shade of a beautiful and ancient gnarly oak: an oak that had, the placard read, "served in the furtherence of Justice."

It turns out that Calabasas, this sumptuous little town now favored by Wealth and Simpson Newlyweds, was not always so genteel, and had at one time "a reputation as one of the toughest and wildest spots in California."


Mind Your Language

An unexpected consequence of blethering away in a blog is that many of the words and phrases its author casually dispenses - part of the never-ending battle to show themselves clever and witty HAH-haaah! <slap target="knee"> - many of those smarm-tongued phrases come home to bite the writer on his ass? They tag the blogger neither "clever" nor "witty", but rather Perverse

Though we may feign otherwise, of course we bloggers look to our Stat Counters at every turn: they tell us not only how many visitors we've had, but where in the world wide web they came from.

Couple of bloggers this week - Vit and Frank f'rinstance - have noted some of the terms that lead people to their blogs. Theirs at least are funny. Mine rather less:

I gave-up the search, he says, quickly trying to recover some diginity, I gave up the search for a Xenoverse link at page thirty-five, and resorted to cheating: I looked-up the stats to see which page my visitor arrived at? Both words are there, sure enough.

I really ought to be more careful: the world does not look kindly upon a smart-arse.

Saturday, May 14, 2005

Something New Every Day

Turns out the definition - and therefore the practise - of the Filibuster is rather looser in america than I had imagined? The dictionary defines the word thus:

fil·i·bus·ter
n.

    1. The use of obstructionist tactics, especially prolonged speechmaking, for the purpose of delaying legislative action.
    2. An instance of the use of this delaying tactic.

  1. An adventurer who engages in a private military action in a foreign country.




I was prompted to look the word up because of something I read - can't remember where, and it was a week or so ago - which described my familiar understanding of it to be the "old-fashioned" meaning, to be quaint; and the piece went on to laugh at the suggestion Senators might be forced to resort to this archaic procedure?

To me, a briton, a filibuster is a parliamentary tactic in which one or two members opposed to a particular piece of legislation will, quite literally, talk it out of debate? They take the floor then refuse to yield it, except to co-conspirators, and will talk and talk for hours and hours - sometimes days - without interruption? It is a demanding and exhausting tactic that requires much preparation - imagine how difficult it must be to talk non-stop for twenty-four hours? Part of the fun, the joy, of the filibuster lies in the rhetorical contortions necessary to connect whatever subject is being spoken of at the moment - vacations in spain, say - to whatever piece of legislation is being bustered - The Defence of the Realm Act, or somesuch?

They are very rare in Britain but they do occur; and afterwards, no matter one's position, there is always a wary, grudging respect paid to those who filibuster successfully.

But here in America, it appears, things are quite different: the term applies to any deliberately obstructionist tactic that plays the rules against the progress of a Bill. Nobody seriously considers filibustering the british way.

So, I wonder, in a non-partisan honest-question way, how do they work here?

Friday, May 13, 2005

Luck-Luck-Luckity-Luck

Thanks, too, to Sploid for reminding me why today is considered unlucky. Today marks the day the Templars mysteriously capitulated, and offered themselves, without fuss, to The Question and to The Flames.

I knew that.

What I didn't know, or realise, is that It's today!

100 Words, or sumpthin'

Now this is an idea with potential?

Today's theme is a photo; we will all be writing our 100 words based on this. I picked this photo quite by accident. We were all supposed to come up with a random word (in a mad-lib kind of way) and then I would do a Google Image Search on that word and voila, we'd have our photo. Except when I plugged the combined words into the GIS nothing came up. So I did a text search, came up with a site in which the words second, green and pleasant were highlighted, plugged that into GIS and this is what we got. Click for bigger.

[Tipples to Michele, who's one of the contributors]

Reminds me a little of those e-mail games we used to play at work... you'd begin, very first time, with an unflattering portrait of a colleague and then contrive for them some hideous, seemingly unavoidable fate...

Their response, and the liturgy for all subsequent verses, begins with their escape, an unflattering portrait of you, and some catastrophic eruption of bullets or somesuch headed towards your pasty face.

Aah, The old days. Where are you, Big Nose?

Thursday, May 12, 2005

A Tiny Sip of Fafnir Blood

NOISY - Wacht Auf! wangvolle Plage! Müh ohne Zweck!" wails Mime at the opening of Wagner's Siegfried five-hours into the cycle, almost Only halfway there!

Forced drudgery! Fruitless toil! he cries, banging sullenly at his anvil. Forging yet another sword for that ungrateful, pleasure-draining, food consuming Wretch!, his charge, who will only smash this sword to pieces too, again, like he always does, like he has done to all the others made for him before.

Mee-meh. Poor Mime: Mime the dwarf; Mime the Nibelung; Mime the hapless brüder of Alberich, who stole Das brightege Rheingold from snootery, mocking mermaid Rheinmädchen, renounced Love, and struck from it Der all-powerful Ring and a magic Tarnhelm hat, used its power to conquer Niebelheim and enslave it's deep-mining dwarves to gather him a Nibelungenhord of gold and treasures; who lost it all, idiot!, to tricksy Loge god of fire, by turning himself first into a fearsome dragon, then into a stupid kleinige Krote frog easily caught. Lost it all, cursing, to ransom himself from one-eyed big-stick Wotan and those other lazy good-fer-nuthin' féy aristocratic gods with their candy-ass Hammers and Rainbows; those self-same gods who sold their hot-tottie lucky-charmed Freia, sweet and sumptious as apples, to a pair of ham-fisted dopewit Giants, Fafner und Fasolt, as fee for building castle Walhall - and then, earsore and repentant, had to pay the giants all the Nibelungenhord, Ringn'all, to fetch her pretty toes back? That Fafnir then, with bloody eyes and a pile o' gold, could crump his greedy brother on the head like Pharoah in the smiting grounds of faraway Aegypt and spill his jumbly brains upon the stoney ground. Took off then, he did, with plunder to a cave in a forest and hid him there as Dragon, storm-wreathed Wurm and not, this time, a pokery toad.

Not as stupid as we thought.

The same, alas, cannot be said of fair hero Siegfried, the boy himself? Blonded, blue-eyed, handsome He, built and brained like the side of a wall. Stark und strong is Siegfried: buckle-nosed alabamer spawn of Siegmund und Sieglinde, bruder und schwester, lovers, twinned by birth and by union. The pair of them gevatered by Wotan himself on a mortal, hoping to grow him an untreatied Hero, gave him a powerful world-beater sword, with a name. The twins live apart and unknown until now, when Siegmund turns-up at her door out of breath, chased through the woods by some bad, bad men. Plunks himself down at her hearth and of course, what happens, those bright-eyed paragons of Virtue, charmed no doubt by themselves in reflection, they do both The Deed and The Business. Boy was Wotan pissed? And she a married wummin too - the scandal alone should have killed them but This, this is The Ring, und Die Walküre to boot so blood is demanded: Hundung her husband, prompted by Wotan smashing the sword, spears poor Siegmund into the earth. Hundung gypped, dismissed and dispatched for his troubles by a flick of the angry one's wrist. Hasten then, Riding, out of the skies, steed-mounted Walküre, coming to carry the carrion Heroes away to the foam-tabled choirs of Walhall. Chiefmost amongst them ahead of the fray, apple of Wotan's one good eye flies Brünnhild the Gorgeous, before she was fat.

"Hoyotoho! Hoyotoho! Heiaha! Heiaha!" sing sisters Gerhilde, Ortlinde, Waltraute, Schwertleite, Helmwige, Siegrune, Grimgerde, Rossweisse happy at large. Brünnhild Der Breasted turns up with the chick, but Hoyoto-Noooo, her sisters too scared to assist so offsky she flies to hide the poor dear somewhere safe.

"Where the feck is Brünnhild" growls dear Papa?

He catches her alone, so alone she shall remain: he puts her to sleep in a Ring of Fire, way way up in the mountains. "Naebdy'll find ur hier!" he thinks, betraying a brogue.

And so, -la-ti-do...

SiegfriedNails.jpg"Zwangvolle Plage! Müh ohne Zweck!" breathless we find ourselves back at the hovel, where we began. Fafnir, the dragon, still in the woods guarding his treasures all these years later; desperate for the tiniest piece of cheese, even; vittels bein' the flaw in 'is plan?

I'd say Mime is probably my favorite character in all the Ring - sometimes maybe Alberich, other times maybe Hagen - but Mime more often than not? I always side with the baddies in operas. Siegfried on the other hand - blond gooey-eyed Siegfried, hero, Held, so strong, so fit, so stirring, and other fine socialist-realist attributes - Siegfried I detest, just as the dwarves do. I mean - look at him ===> standing there, big flabby nancy examining his nails like a girl? Thick as a bucket of porridge, but full of himself. He deserves to die: and who better to stick it to him and maybe make a tidy profit on the side but Mime? Poor wretched much-maligned Mime?

He almost succeeds. Almost. The story runs that Siegfried, pissy and prissy, discards Mime's long-labored sword and decides to build his own: to re-build his own, rather, soldering the shattered shards of Notung! and banging the pieces, loudly, with his mighty clattering hammer to enshrine its very own exclamation point within it <aside>I shall never get used to the american pronunciation of "solder" - sodder </aside> until finally, naturally the loathsome pantywaist succeeds, as we all guessed he would. As I've said, utterly insufferable.

Well, now that Der verflagtiche Held has his own verflugtege Schwert he decides, as nordic heroes must, to venture into the forest and slay dragon Fafnir in his mist-wrapped layer. 'The hell did Fafnir ever do to him? It was his treasure, remember, given as ransom for Freia, the sweetest and prettiest goddess, whom the the other gods cleverly sold to the giants as payment for fortress Walhall, before they remembered it was her dainty apples kept them immortal? Fafnir, der Wurm, he worked so hard for that treasure: and now the joxy Superboy comes to steal it? P'tah! What kind of morality is this to teach to sensitive snuffling opera lovers?

And so, at last, we begin to approach the point of the post - I promise you, almost there: it was never meant to be about Der Ring - creeping through the forest with Mime while fat arse stomps ahead crushing all foliage and blasting his cow horn. Alberich, hated bruder, pokes out from a tree: "You know that dragon's got my Ring, don't you? Well keep your filthy paws off it: it's mein, Mein! I tell you!" mime hatches a simple plot for revenge - so elegant and self-fulfilling he won't even have to do very much: Let the fleischkopf boy take care of the dragon, then poison the bastard with a refreshing cuppie o' tea and take der Ring und der Tarnhelm and die Treasuren for himself! Brilliant!
Dann wahrlich müht sich Mime nicht mehr;Then truly Mime's toil will be over;
ihm schaffen andre den ew'gen Schatz.others will make eternal wealth for him.
Mime, der kühne, Mime is König,Mime the bold, Mime is king,
Fürst der Alben, Walter des Alls!prince of the elves, ruler of all!
Hei, Mime! Wie glückte dir das!Hi, Mime! How lucky you are!
Wer hätte wohl das gedacht?Who would have thought it?


But: but Noooooooo! The halfwit boy catches a splash of Fafnir blood on the back of his hand and licks it off! the savage! Faff the magic dragon has faffing magic blood! All of a sudden the bozon can understand the chirping of the birdies and - disastrously - the subvocal thinkings of Mime. Poor old Mime, on the verge of finally doing something right, speaks with his voice enticing words that invite the drythroat boy to slake his mighty fighter thirst, but underneath the boy can hear all of his plans!

Ach, poor Mime - done to death by that bloody Schwert, murdered by that gormless tit. All undone by a sip of Fafnir's blood.

Take ye then, oh long-suffering reader, back to today, to the Now and the Future: take thee to NASA and see what the bastards are upto now?

NASA is developing a subvocal speech system that could enable you to make a phone call while keeping your lips sealed.

How do you talk to someone without opening your mouth? Psychics call it telepathy. NASA refers to it as subvocal speech. Scientists at the NASA Ames Research Center in California have developed a system of tiny sensors that read nerve signals in the throat that control speech. You may not make a sound when, say, you read silently, but your nervous system is buzzing with activity. Recently, they used the system to make the first subvocal cell phone call.


[Cock o' the tricorn to the magnificent Boing-Boing]

No! No! Nein!

NASA is developing a subvocal speech system to steal your thoughts!

This is what happens, I tell you, when you hideaway Nazi scientists and use them for your own rocket programs! Oh they give you the rockets, sure they do, but they're giving you Fafnirblut too, though you'll notice they never fit it to themselves, cos that would give the game away?

Your thoughts are your own? For how long, d'ya think?

Look behind you, little Mime, and be careful - or he'll get you again.


Wednesday, May 11, 2005

There are only two kinds of ship...

D-Perisher96.jpg ID I EVER MENTION that I'm a sucker for computer games? I'm sure I must have?

It was, I maintain, a purely professional interest that led me to purchase a first graphics card, and with it Zork Nemesis, for my crappy old P-155 back in '96?

I had, ironically, just quit my job of twelve years, grinding-out simulators for the same miserable defence company, the last four spent designing visuals - computer generated imagery, CGI - for a range of naval simulators, my specialty, including three or four attack periscopes and a majestic ships bridge, magnum opus, which projected ten overlapping, perfectly synchronized displays onto a mammoth 240o screen; all around a complete ships bridge sat on a motion platform. I loved that work, "graphics", and had the kind of job many software engineers would slit their granny's throat to land. But I hated the company, and eventually had to escape it.

It was the kind of company that kept our salaries low throughout the Thatcher recession with phoney bleats of imminent redundancy, all the while taking the government to the cleaners and raking-in huge profits. Lucky to have a job, we were, and nowhere else to go. I learned one time they were charging the RAF £3000 per-day for my services on-site, while barfing my [legitimate] expense claims because they were 30p over the £20 limit for dinner. That kind of cheapskate bureauntosaur.

I quit graphics and simulators for the world of communications. Not nearly so glamorous, or showey, but the companies I've since worked for have been fivefold better, in every other respect.

That was, ten, twelve years ago? [Thrasher was one of my last...] Just around the time that 3D graphics cards were beginning to be developed for PC's. We never used PC's for anything important: our visuals ran on SGI Reality Engines - Power, Onyx, Crimson - hugely expensive and state-of-the-art way back then. The simulators featured mock periscopes with optics that looked straight-up into a high-res display that rotated with the viewer, the image "rotating" in the horizontal.

So: buy the card, buy a game, check out PC graphics, see how they compare to the expensive gear.

Honest.

Hundreds of games and many years later, I finally find one that compares; and I've been enjoying it immensely for the past couple of weeks, reliving past glories through the lens of a WW-II era U-Boat sim called Silent Hunter III.

I'd swear they'd seen my stuff?

My attack periscopes train submariners, and are usually part of larger Ops Room or Control Room simulators. One of my scopes tests prospective submarine commanders as part of the Royal Navy's notorious and fiendish "perishers" course, where it is written:

There are only two kinds of ship: submarines, and targets.


The walls there are draped in Jolly Rogers - flown by tradition on Royal Navy submarines on return to port after a kill. Most of these date from WW-II, and each is hand-made and tagged with kills, like those old fighter planes.

Most of the features are there in the game, remarkably similar in execution but slightly better looking: I'd bet they read the same Pixar paper I did to contrive the sea model, for the waves move and swirl very much as mine did? But they're better textured and are wonderfully reflective - something I never achieved. Bow waves, stern wakes, drain-down - where sheets of water slide down the lens as it breaks the surface or as waves flow into it - all these necessary effects are there. The drain-down is especially good. The bow waves are not correctly modelled, though: they're supposed to grow and move down the length of the ship as its speed increases, and a second wave, an aft wave, should erupt beyond a certain point and progress towards the stern? Important visual cues for a real sub commander. My sim had a more realistic stadimeter - a ghost image is supposed to move up or down with the range dial - and my explosions and fires were better I say, Hah. No buoyage though, an important part of real sims - but it's WW-II.

The coastline, the terrain, is utterly dreadful and devoid of feature: but then, it's a game, and teaching coastal navigation is not one of its aims. Sad really - because being able to handle an accurately-modelled coastline thousands of miles long, that is the killer challenge in naval simulators. That's the thing that'll break a coder's back and tear out a modeller's goldie locks.

But for fifty bucks, and you like that sort of thing? The game's a steal.

Along with happy-glow memories come some of the baaad: visuals in a simulator, let me tell you, are a horrorshow of panic magnified, x6 like the scope, by having to look pretty and pass the subjective filters of their purchasers? To draw - to render - an evolving and intricately-detailed scene from scratch, twenty-four times per second, with limited polygon drawing power; that is a technical challenge worth fearing. Thousands of polygons - by which they mean triangles - you could be drawing to be clipped to those that ought to be seen, then optimized for efficient delivery to the rendering engines. Nightmare. So-called "procedural" models of things that meld with time - the sea, the clouds, foam and spray, propellers, vortices, buoy lights, smoke and flames and explosions and fog - for which every vertex has to be computed anew in every frame, colored and shaded and textured, these mix with the "static" models whose shape does not change but whose quality must be exceptional - ships, coastline, aircraft, shops and piers even - a world to be drawn and shaded on a blank piece of paper twenty-four times every second. Makes your head spin, it does.

And it has to look good.

And it has to look right!

Some officer walks in of a morning, complains that the sea is not green enough? You change it. His superior arrives in the afternoon, tells you to make the sea bluer, greyer? You do. Next morning repeat and rinse, but add an angry I asked for the sea to be greener ad nauseum.

But you learn things; little things; odd things. You learn how to take your bearings from landmarks; how to triangulate your position; how a "cocked-hat" reveals your error? You learn that, to submariners, torpedoes are strictly incoming - that if anyone shouts Torpedoe! you're all gonna die? You learn that weapons are yours, that you shoot them or launch them but never Fire them, not even guns! "Fire" means FIRE!!!, as in a crowded theater. You learn that submarine commanders stand on tip-toes when peering through a periscope. You learn that they sneak right under enemy ships in friendly times, taking pictures as they go. Count the blades; check-out the domes; hull needs a good scraping.

You learn to appreciate that it's just a simulation, just a game, and that you'll always head home to the kiddies at night.

Would I go back to that?

Yes. Yes I would.

Monday, May 09, 2005

How to tell a story

Some folks are just way better at this than me.

Hooraay!


VE-Day-lorry-sm.jpg


Not Huzzah! - we say H o o r a y !

Saturday, May 07, 2005

Are you Betty, Queen of Scots?

H-Britannia96.jpgER BRITANNIC MAJESTY, as she is labelled in my passport, has many titles, amongst them Queen of England and Queen of Scots.

Notice the distinction? It once was important to us.

There has never been a King or Queen of Scotland, though much of the literature you may come across on the web will deceive you? No: since Kenneth MacAlpin treacherously unified the scots and the picts under one crown in 841AD, there have only been Kings or Queens of Scots - monarch of the people, never of the land. At the ancient palace of Scone - pronounced "Skoon" in a fit of perverse mockery towards the timeless Sconn/Scoan battle - where scottish kings and queens were traditionally crowned while sat upon the Stone of Destiny, there is a small hillock - the Moot Hill - where scottish nobles would empty a sack or two of their native soil to stand upon, and from that vantage swear allegiance to the new monarch. Monarch of the people, not the land.

James VI, King of Scots - the Wisest Fool, progenitor of your favorite translation of the Bible, original hater of the game of Gowff - he was first to muddy the title waters. In 1649, by dint of his lineage, he was acclaimed King of England too, and joined the crowns of England and Scotland in a union that lasts to this day. James the First and Sixth, he is often called. It was said of him, to digress for a moment, that he once had two babies - a boy and a girl - raised in absolute isolation on the island of Inchcolm in the Firth of Forth, to prove his theory that Hebrew is the natural language of all mankind. Didn't work. Anyway, to return: The Union of the Crowns brought into being for the very first time the nation state of Great Britain. We scots have always been the prickly lesser partner in this union, and have always insisted on maintaining a measure of our own ways: we had our own parliament until 1707, when scottish nobles sold us out for £150,000; but we still today have our own, separate legal system. Scots Law, which encompasses all civil and criminal law in Scotland, famous - or infamous - because of its "Not Proven" alternative to "Guilty" or "Not Guilty" verdicts? It means "we know you did it, but they couldnae prove it" so we set you free, and free too from future jeopardy.

Despite our annoying nationalistic tendencies - we will shout you down should you ever imply we are english, we paste our cars and our cubicles with Saltyres and Lions Rampant - it is we, oddly, not they, who are quickest and most comfortable calling ourselves "British" or our country "Britain"? To the english of every stripe There'll Always Be An England, which to them means the entire british isles and Ireland too. It pains us deeply that their view prevails in America.

Our present monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, or ER II (Elizabeth Regina II), is not without her scottish controversy, as my good reader DarkoV reminded me recently? Her coronation in Westminster Abbey, back in 1953, was the singular event that caused british households to purchase television sets: before that day britons had been more than content with cat's-whisker radio sets. You can see for yourself the pomp and regalia that attended that occasion.

She was, in fact, crowned twice: once in Westminster, then later again in Edinburgh, where she accepted the "Honours" of Scotland - the crown, the sceptre, the sword of state. But on that occasion she wore no robes - unlike the scottish nobility who attended her - but instead turned-up in what has since become her everyday fare: a turquiose suit, a funny hat, and that goddamned f*cking handbag.

Imagine: you are crowned Queen of a proud and ancient nation and you turn up for the occasion in a hat and a handbag?

Worse: she is decidedly Elizabeth II - not now, not ever "Elizabeth the first and second", nor even "Elizabeth I, Queen of Scots."

Should you ever visit Edinburgh Castle and take the tour that includes our Honours, there too you will see paintings of that great state occasion, and an honest commentary of its controversies.

Given this long-standing grievance I have no qualms relaying the following gossip to you. I apologize if I have written this before - one of the failings of a poor memory; one of its blessings is that I'm always able to laugh at The Simpsons freshly?

This story was told to me by Wee Tony, a colleague from way way back when we both worked for a british defence conglomerate. Wee Tony was of irish descent, and could spin a yarn better than most. A strange and interesting character, an accomplished session musician, keyboard and tin-whistle and saxophone player in a band called Choux-Parrot, and later sadly taken from us in a horrific car accident. It was Wee Tony, incidentally, who introduced me to the "two kinds of music" quote, and encouraged me to open my ears.

Wee Tony was part of the team that installed the "new" security system in Buckingham Palace after the Queen, in her nightie, was visited by Michael Fagin, a burglar who proceeded to unburden all of his personal troubles on our poor listening Queen. That Tony worked there on that project is absolutely true.

What he told us was that, while installing and testing security cameras, the engineers noticed how policemen, maids, gardeners - any kind of lowlevel staff - would occasionally run towards bushes, cupboards, doorways, any place near, and hide themselves. They learned that Her Majesty,and her family, are not supposed to see the staff: so whenever a Royal approaches the staff all run to hiding places! Apart from personal retainers and Court hangers-on-in-waiting, the Royal Family is not supposed to know they have a staff - remarkable!

It is also true that the Queen never visits the bathroom, and always wears gloves wherever she goes because nobody - outside her family, at least, nobody is permitted to touch the monarch's flesh. When she is forced to shake a hand, when preznits visit or whatever, she does so gloved.

The handbag, dear DarkoV, carries within it a brick.

Thursday, May 05, 2005

Score!

I have a lot of time for Andrew Sullivan, who kinda sorta wears his honesty on his sleeve, but when all is said and done, he's still a Tory.

And, to quote Pat Kane from many, many years ago, "There are no good Tories: there are only f*cking Tories."

Poor Andrew: this is exactly the kind of thing we used to say when Thatcher or Major won.

A Blair majority reduced to forty or fifty or however many it turns out to be (it's at twenty-three right now) is not a catastrophe by any means, but rather something to be celebrated: he'll have to be more careful now, more considerate of his own back benchers, and rather less presidential in his behavior. No bad thing: massive majorities, to my mind, are as dangerous as monopolies. So at worst, this brings politics in Britain back to normal - as I think Blunkett himself remarked?

And of course, the day will come soon enough when he - like her - will be tipped The Spot by his own swabs, and Long Gordy Brown will take over.

The worst part of this evening's results - which I find almost incomprehensible - is that Gorgeous George won a seat in Bethnel Green, in London? How anyone could vote for this dictator-loving sleazebag is beyond me. Shameful. But there you go. Wasn't me, anyone asks.


* Apologies for the nautical language, but I'm still recovering from this snapshot of a World of Warcraft crew of Pirates being chastised by an on-line monitor, and remaining entirely within character throughout. It's a Pirate Sign o' Respect, indeed. I'm sure I found this link on Boing-Boing, but for the life o' me, I can't find where?

Tuesday, May 03, 2005

I Can See Your House From Here

E-ElevatorSm.jpg LEVATOR TO THE STARS" read the unobtrusive, classically-lettered marquee; and bracketed below, "(World's Tallest Thermometer)." The once-tiny town of Baker, CA - last town on the long desert highway to Nevada state line - squat on the salt-flat Mojave floor at the fringe of Death Valley. A tiny town once, but nowadays transformed, subsumed, eaten almost, by this living, growing beastly progress? Where once were Denny's, Bob's Big Boys, Mad Greeks, homes, trailers, and various sundry gas stations - rest stops baking in the Baker sun - now are tendrilled roots, convincingly organic, spread and spreading miles wide, miles deep and - most famously of all - miles high. I was here to pay my respects. And of course, to take the trip.

Beyond the simple labelled portal, with its long vine-sheltered lines, a vestibule opens onto an atrium, impossibly high-ceilinged, bordered all around by check-in desks, check-out desks, bellhops and ticket scalps - by all the humdrum orderlies of modern-day resorts. The walls - no, not walls, that barely does them justice - the cavern faces shimmer and dance with color in the manner of deep-water squid and cuttlefish; now dark, now light, now flitting flashing shapeless shifts curling and jiving and streaking in every direction, up and away; always somehow tasteful, subdued? How incongruous, then, amidst this flittering wonder, that spaced at four-desk intervals all around, the waving, faux-humble portraits of the man behind it all: Smilin' Tom McEnnerby. This unassuming small-town rancher, who had taken-on the wide wide world and won, now smiles lop-headed, sheepish even, on we his fellow flock? Do not be fooled: his sly desert cunning it was that masterminded what many regard as the dirtiest, the nastiest, the ballsiest zoning commission in history? Regardless of your view of it, the McEnnerby campaign must surely rank the most entertaining? "One way or another," he had promised, "The people of Baker, California, will hold that thermometer and that record. It is our birthright." And so he mote it be: the Thermometer you can see from space! This man, this ruin of Presidents and foreign governments alike, this man who had persuaded one Governor - the revivified movie mogul R-Walt Disney, no stranger himself to nanobiological construction - to declare the town and its surroundings "Injun Land", as he so-incautiously quipped, and grant to it the commensurate "Rights and Benefits Thereto &c." This man had turned his sleepy tumbleweed town, against all probability, into an absolute law unto itself, himself, beyond the reach of governments, State, Federal, and Foreign. He is no sheep, this man, but rather the shepherd who corrals and fattens his fluffy-tailed lambs to lead them more happily to the slaughter. He lives, as they say, "up top", and from his Palace du Sol he powers the entire western seaboard - our homes, our businesses, our air-conditioning and pool pumps. Our benefactor.

I digress - but who cannot? To stand here in this glorious hall, at the very foot of the Beanstalk, in this fabulous nanofabbed creation and not for one moment reflect upon the man who planted it here? The world's first, and only, Space Elevator? He is, if ever there was, The Man.

As I say - respect.

The elevator, as most of you already know, is a "living", growing organism modelled - loosely, it must be said - on Papaver Somniferum: the Opium Poppy? A hundred kilometers tall, it's "leaves" unfurl at its base here on earth and form a soaring five-mile canopy for its jungleform network of "roots". Those same spreading roots that firmly plant the towering stalk to the planet, they embody within them this very cathedral, its malls, restauraunts, casinos, and all its legion of guest rooms. It is a giant weed, built of self-replicating nanocells coded with lab-created NanodanoTM - there is no nature here - our furthest reach towards deity, or hubris, according to perspective? Phoney DNA, of course; Lego DNA, Meccano DNA, Transformer DNA: think of any kiddie constructor kit, some wag columnist will have suffixed "DNA" to it and even your granny will know what is meant by it? It's creators - pun very much intended - take great pains to explain that Nanodano is not actual DNA of any kind: it is, for one thing, completely understood by them, they tell us, unlike the real thing? It is nothing more than software, only that: software coded into every nanobot that tells it what to do and where and when, and for how long? How very reassuring.

Cynicism, columnist's friend, is very much alive on the outside looking in, and from the comforts of hindsight looking back: but upon arrival at the site itself, "live" as it were - whether upon approach from Victorville, upon standing in line at the gate, or upon finally gaining entrance - at all such points our otherwise-trusty cynimascope is simply overwhelmed by the grandeur and magnificence, the wonder of this endeavour? Consider: it is a long walk from entranceway to elevator - a very long walk - and the winding path, never direct, is paved with slot machines and gaming tables and the teeming thousands of gamblers, visitors, and tourists who are content to rest here at the foothills, at base-camp, and leave the climbing of the mountain to those of sterner constitution? For which read "richer", for only the very wealthy, highest of High Rollers, can afford an apartment up there. I can feel your lips curling, your sarcasm slowly biting; but - believe me - were you there, in the very midst of it, your mouth would be wide agape, as was mine, in shock and utter submission to its majesty. Trumped by incredulity, your correspondent can only offer his apologies.

Moving along, press-pass firmly in hand, my ticket, passport, through crowds of poorly-dressed mid-westerners and snake-eyed elderly ladies removed from ghosttown Vegas now returned to dirt and dust, ears ringing and wrung, traipse the yellow-brick carpeted road to the Liftport. You know from the literature that there is no One elevator, but many - two hundred and fifty-seven, to be exact - arranged in barrel formation rather like a Gattling gun. But that is book knowledge, of a kind that recalls the Great Wall of China or the Great Pyramid of Cheops? To be forwarned is not to be forearmed, contrary to popular wisdom. Two hundred and fifty-seven elevators - a number chosen as a joke by its creators as the least-probable number in all of computerdom - are a remarkable sight when arrayed. Deploy as a Gattling gun, behave as a Gattling gun: you sit within a bullet. Terrifying. And yet... somehow comforting? You are conducted to your padded stall as a rube by carnies at a fairground ride. Nine rings of seven seats revolve columnwise, one by one, to be filled and fitted with a body. Strapped-in tight and spun past the gate until all the seats are filled and the door finally closes. A soft-toned presentation begins: "Welcome, and thank-you for choosing the Betty McEnnerby Spaceport, Elevator to the Stars. The gate is now clear, and we are clear for departure. Our destination today is Otherworld, and our expected flight time is thirty-sevent minutes. The temperature outside is ninety-seven degrees. In the unlikely event..." I won't bore you with further details, except that in the end, several minutes later, at last, we are treated to a countdown: "Ten, nine, eight, seven, six, T minus five seconds and boosters are go, three, two, one..."

Whoosh.

I mean - WHOOOOOOOSH !!!!!. Amidst the amplified roar of non-existent rocket motors, we launch. We are propelled - literally - rifling through the barrel. I have no words to describe how the senses react to such acceleration, and find myself reduced, shamefully, to invoking the much-overused "awesome". Totally. I think of the billions of tiny polarized gyroscopes whose precession makes my journey possible? Each strike from below repelled to the perpendicular, but woven into a cunningly-contrived alignment that spins and propels onwards and upwards, velocity in the vertical approaching 300 km/hr. One grows quickly accustomed to the forces, as the body accomodates, until one is sitting quite comfortably, if safely constrained by the harness? But later - seven times in all, and without warning - the capsule hits the boosters and the bumpers as it progresses through the tube. The boosters shoot forward, faster: the bumpers brake. Thrilling and stunning. Almost the most thrilling, the most stunning thing you will ever experience. Almost, but not quite. It is, after all, an elevator. Nobody speaks, we avert our gaze, calming muzak spoils the background for those without laptops. Faint smell of urine.

But all is different at the top.

Otherworld.

Literally, another world: a nation unto itself, were such a concept meaningful there? Of course everyone who leaves the capsule wants only to run to the windows... or so I thought? Two ladies headed-off in search of bars and clubs and restaurants and casinos - any kind of gathering place or entertainment pallisade? They, I later learned, sought other stars? Not content with unparallelled views of Polaris or dogged Sirius, they fled in search of Brad Pitts, Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, Ronaldo Linguinis? Without success, it transpires. Whereas I, who gaped and gawped and held oceans between pinched fingers, I stood next to Patrick Stewart. Rather shorter than I imagined him to be?

The inside view from Otherworld is of our planet: all of the US, Canada, Mexico, and a lot of Pacific. The outside view, on the other hand, is of the carpeted madness of the Milky Way, and utterly transcendent. This, I quipped, is what we mean by "Spiritual".

How curious my desire to lay some human context upon this scene? There in the vasty space of God, I found myself quietly humming "Blue Danube."



Monday, May 02, 2005

Bases loaded...

Swing96.jpgLoaded96.jpgBases loaded, true, but nothing came of it this time. Rockies' pitcher seemed to enjoy 3-ball brinkmanship, as he seemed to wind-up to three balls with every hitter?


Dodgers win 2-1... continuing my unbroken run of Home Wins - they've won every time I've been there to watch. It's when I'm not there that the Dodgers go to mince!